Sitejet review: a volume builder for agencies

What Sitejet is, and who it is for

Sitejet targets the agency that produces sites in quantity: a template library, a production workflow, and a cost structure where the marginal site is cheap rather than a fresh subscription.

That structure is genuinely different from Webflow's or Wix Studio's, where each site carries its own plan. At roughly $5 to $7 per additional hosted site, a portfolio of fifty sites costs a different order of magnitude — which is the reason to look at it.

Like every platform in this dataset, it is not an editor you can put inside your own application.

How we assessed it

We have not run Sitejet hands-on, so there is no score, no code sample and no measurement here.

More than that: this is one of the thinner entries in the dataset. There is no npm package or public repository, and our verification pass could confirm the agency tier and per-site pricing but not the full plan structure. Where we could not confirm, the fields are null and this page says so rather than filling the gap from marketing copy. See methodology for why we hold that line.

Strengths

Per-site economics built for volume. The clearest structural advantage over per-site subscription platforms, and the reason agencies with large portfolios evaluate it.

A production workflow rather than a design tool. Templates, reusable assets and a hand-off process aimed at delivery rather than exploration.

Client editing with guardrails, so clients can maintain content without breaking layouts.

Hosting included at the per-site price, which removes an operational line agencies otherwise carry themselves.

Limitations

Not embeddable. Your product cannot host this editor.

Incomplete published pricing, at least as far as our verification could establish — which is itself a finding when you are comparing against vendors that publish every tier.

Hosted only, so data residency is not addressable.

Little independent evidence. No repository, no registry entry, no third-party benchmark we can cite. Compared with the measurable libraries in this dataset, you are relying on the vendor.

White-label extent unconfirmed. If your clients must never see the vendor's name, establish exactly what is rebrandable before committing a portfolio.

Questions to ask before you buy

1. Publish every tier for us in writing, including what the first plan below Agency costs and what it omits.
2. What is rebrandable, precisely? Editor, client dashboard, notification emails, published output.
3. What is the total for fifty sites on the billing cycle we would use?
4. What is the export path for a client site if we or the client leave?
5. Where is the data hosted, and can that be constrained?

Where it sits in this dataset

Sitejet belongs with Duda, Brizy and Wix Studio as an agency-facing platform, and its distinguishing feature is the per-site cost curve rather than the editor.

Against building on an engine, the comparison is the usual one: our calculator puts a customer-facing builder at roughly 520 engineering hours, and at $5 per site per month it takes a very large portfolio before that arithmetic favours building. The white-label category page has the full list under the branding constraint.